Abstract

Study design: Retrospective patient series analysis with update of long-term data.

Objective: To define the long-term prognosis of the thoracolumbar/lumbar correction after selective anterior spinal fusion (ASF) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Summary of background data: The ASF is a well-described procedure for the treatment of AIS. The correction reliability over time, the consequences in adjacent spinal levels and patient’s quality of life are fundamental for the characterization of AIS treatment.

Methods: One hundred seven patients were submitted to single-rod ASF for thoracolumbar/lumbar (ThL/L) AIS between 1993 and 2016 in a single-surgeon experience. Seventy five were available for final follow-up evaluation 9 years ±4 (2-23) after surgery. A clinical and sequential radiographic evaluations were performed.

Results: The mean age at surgery was 16 years ± 2.33 (14-20) and 94 (87%) were females. The mean final follow-up of the 75 patients available was 9 years ± 4 (2-23). Sixty-five patients had a Lenke type 5C curve and 10 had a type 6C curve. The mean values of the Scoliosis Research Society 22 (SRS-22) questionnaire in Lenke 5C was 92 ± 9 (71-109) and in Lenke 6C 90.3 ± 9 (75-107). In Lenke 5C group, the mean preoperative ThL Cobb angle was 38.4° ± 9.3 (21-60) and the postoperative was 5.9° ± 4.5 (0-18; P < 0.001) being similar at the final follow-up (P > 0.05). In Lenke 6C group, the mean preoperative ThL Cobb angle was 58.6° ± 13.9 (40-90) and the postoperative ThL Cobb was 22.6° ± 14.5 (5-48, P < 0.001) being similar at the final follow-up (P > 0.05). The mean preoperative Thoracic (Th) Cobb angle was 39° ± 7.6 (30-50), the postoperative was 30.6° ± 10.1 (14-49, P < 0.008) and in the final follow-up was 29.3° ± 10.7 (11-48, P < 0.011).

Conclusion: ASF is a safe procedure in the treatment of ThL/L with good long-term results and high rates of satisfaction among patients with AIS Lenke type 5C. The partial correction was frequent in Lenke type 6C despite the absence of progression in the non-instrumented curves.

Level of evidence: 4.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all “Cited by” articles

References

Lonstein JE. Scoliosis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 443:248–259.

  1. Dwyer AF, Newton NC, Sherwood AA. An anterior approach to scoliosis. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1969; 62:192–202.
  1. Zielke K, Pellin B. New instruments and implants for supplementation of the Harrington system. Z Orthop lhre Grenzgeb 1976; 114:534–537.
  1. Murphy RF, Mooney JF 3rd. The crankshaft phenomenon. J Am Acad Orthop Sur 2017; 25:e185–e193.
  1. Luo M, Wang W, Shen M, et al. Anterior versus posterior approach in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis of fusion segments and radiological outcomes. J Orthop Surg Res 2016; 11:77.
  1. Lenke LG, Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH. The Lenke classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how it organizes curve patterns as a template to perform selective fusions of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28:S199–S207.
  1. Short segment anterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar scoliosis. In: Bridwell KH, ed. The Textbook of Spinal Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1997. pp. 665–670.
  1. Lowe TG, Betz R, Lenke L, et al. Anterior single-rod instrumentation of the thoracic and lumbar spine: saving levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28:S208–S216.
  1. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24:1435–1440.
  1. Cheung JPY, Luk KD. Managing the pediatric spine: growth assessment. Asian Spine J 2017; 11:804–816.
  1. Yu B, Zhang JG, Qiu GX, et al. Selective anterior thoracolumbar/lumbar fusion and instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Chin Med J (Engl) 2010; 123:3003–3008.
  1. Dong Y, Weng X, Zhao H, et al. Lenke 5C curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: anterior vs posterior selective fusion. Neurosurgery 2016; 78:324–331.
  1. Kelly DM, McCarthy RE, McCullough FL, et al. Long-term outcomes of anterior spinal fusion with instrumentation for thoracolumbar and lumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35:194–198.
  1. Geck MJ, Rinella A, Hawthorne D, et al. Comparison of surgical treatment in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: anterior dual rod versus posterior pedicle fixation surgery: a comparison of two practices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34:1942–1951.
  1. Dwyer AF, Schafer MF. Anterior approach to scoliosis. Results of treatment in fifty-one cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1974; 56:218–224.
  1. Halm HF, Liljenqvist U, Niemeyer T, et al. Halm-Zielke instrumentation for primary stable anterior scoliosis surgery: operative technique and 2-year results in ten consecutive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients within a prospective clinical trial. Eur Spine J 1998; 7:429–434.
  1. Moskowitz A, Trommanhauser S. Surgical and clinical results of scoliosis surgery using Zielke instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993; 18:2444–2451.
  1. Suk SI, Lee CK, Chung SS. Comparison of Zielke ventral derotation system and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in the treatment of idiopathic lumbar and thoracolumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994; 19:419–429.
  1. Turi M, Johnston CE 2nd, Richards BS. Anterior correction of idiopathic scoliosis using TSRH instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993; 18:417–422.
  1. Kaneda K, Shono Y, Satoh S, et al. New anterior instrumentation for the management of thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Application of the Kaneda two-rod system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996; 21:1250–1261. discussion 1261–2.
  1. Hamill CL, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. The use of pedicle screw fixation to improve correction in the lumbar spine of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Is it warranted? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996; 21:1241–1249.
  1. Shufflebarger HL, Geck MJ, Clark CE. The posterior approach for lumbar and thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: posterior shortening and pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29:269–276. discussion 276.
  1. Burton DC, Asher MA, Lai SM. Patient-based outcomes analysis of patients with single torsion thoracolumbar-lumbar scoliosis treated with anterior or posterior instrumentation: an average 5- to 9-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27:2363–2367.
  1. Lowe TG, Alongi PR, Smith DA, et al. Anterior single rod instrumentation for thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with and without the use of structural interbody support. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28:2232–2241. discussion 2241–2.
  1. Hee HT, Yu ZR, Wong HK. Comparison of segmental pedicle screw instrumentation versus anterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32:1533–1542.
  1. Wang Y, Fei Q, Qiu G, et al. Anterior spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion for moderate lumbar/thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33:2166–2172.
  1. Wang T, Zeng B, Xu J, et al. Radiographic evaluation of selective anterior thoracolumbar or lumbar fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2008; 17:1012–1018.
  1. Li M, Ni J, Fang X, et al. Comparison of selective anterior versus posterior screw instrumentation in Lenke5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34:1162–1166.
  1. Senkoylu A, Luk KD, Wong YW, et al. Prognosis of spontaneous thoracic curve correction after the selective anterior fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar (Lenke 5C) curves in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 2014; 14:1117–1124.
  1. Delfino R, Pizones J, Ruiz-Juretschke C, et al. Selective anterior thoracolumbar fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: long-term results after 17-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017; 42:E788–E794.
  1. Satake K, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, et al. Analysis of the lowest instrumented vertebra following anterior spinal fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: can we predict postoperative disc wedging? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30:418–426.
  1. Halm H, Niemeyer T, Link T, et al. Segmental pedicle screw instrumentation in idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2000; 9:191–197.
  1. Gitelman Y, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Pulmonary function in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis relative to the surgical procedure: a 10-year follow-up analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36:1665–1672.
  1. Yuan HA, Garfin SR, Dickman CA, et al. A historical cohort study of pedicle screw fixation in thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spinal fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994; 19 (20 suppl):2279S–2296S.
  1. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Sansur CA, et al. Rates of infection after spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36:556–563.
  1. Coe JD, Arlet V, Donaldson W, et al. Complications in spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the new millennium. A report of the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31:345–349.
  1. Bitan FD, Neuwirth MG, Kuflik PL, et al. The use of short and rigid anterior instrumentation in the treatment of idiopathic thoracolumbar scoliosis: a retrospective review of 24 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27:1553–1557.
  1. Sweet FA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Prospective radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications of single solid rod instrumented anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26:1956–1965.
  1. Sanders AE, Baumann R, Brown H, et al. Selective anterior fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in adolescents: when can the associated thoracic curve be left unfused? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28:706–713. discussion 714.
  1. Huitema GC, Jansen RC, van Ooij A, et al. Predictability of spontaneous thoracic curve correction after anterior thoracolumbar correction and fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A retrospective study on a consecutive series of 29 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Spine J 2015; 15:966–970.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *